For governments, regulators, state-owned enterprises, and critical institutions evaluating secure AI deployment. Inquiries are reviewed directly by the founding team.
For governments, regulators, state-owned enterprises, and critical institutions evaluating secure AI deployment. Inquiries are reviewed directly by the founding team.
Before any model touches institutional data, the boundary, the policy, and the accountable owner are established in writing. The assessment produces that document.
A short unclassified exchange to establish mandate, jurisdiction, and the workflow under consideration. No sensitive material is requested at this stage.
A structured review of data boundaries, existing systems, policy constraints, and the decisions the workflow supports — conducted with your technical and security owners.
A written deployment architecture: where the control plane runs, how identity and policy are enforced, what is logged, and which models are permitted for which data classes.
One workflow, defined success criteria, named accountable owner, and the acceptance evidence required before production — the entry point to the 90-Day Pilot.
The full assessment as a structured document your institution can complete internally before any pilot: workflow qualification, data boundary and classification register, systems of record, policy constraints, deployment posture, permitted-model matrix, success criteria, and sign-off. Nothing needs to leave your institution to complete it.